help

A Smarter, More Reliable Way to Level Reading Materials for Students

2025-05-20T08:43:50-05:00May 20th, 2025|General, Latest News, Reading Recovery Teaching|

Matching students with books at just the right reading level is critical—but not always easy. Traditional leveling systems often rely heavily on content features alone, which can lead to unreliable results and mismatches between students and texts.

In their recent article, Validation Analysis During the Design Stage of Text Leveling, researchers Jerome D’Agostino and Connie Briggs introduce a more robust, research-driven approach called integrated leveling. This method doesn’t just rely on expert judgment or surface features—it blends those with proven test development practices, like field testing and item analysis, to validate the complexity of each text.

Interestingly, the initial book levels assigned by review committees actually aligned quite well with how students performed during testing. Field testing helped fine-tune the levels and confirm where each book truly belongs on the difficulty scale, but the expert judgments were largely on target from the start. That’s good news—it suggests that with the right validation processes, we can trust the professional insights of educators and still strengthen them with data.

So, what does this mean for teachers? Integrated leveling offers a more accurate, evidence-backed way to identify student reading needs, inform instruction, and track growth over time. It’s a thoughtful balance of educator expertise and empirical validation—one that leads to better reading support for every student.

References:

D’Agostino, J. V., & Briggs, C. (2025). Validation Analysis During the Design Stage of Text Leveling. Education Sciences15(5), 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050607

Kingfishers, Tuataras, and Sheep, Oh My! Rethinking Book Introductions by Kathleen A. Brown

2025-04-22T11:19:05-05:00April 22nd, 2025|Latest News, Reading Recovery Teaching, Teaching|

Ever discover a book that you think is a perfect choice for a student or group, and realize you are unable to give a proper book introduction? Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the topic and lack sufficient knowledge about the subject or content.

In the early days of Reading Recovery, we had limited book choices. Many of our texts came from Australia or New Zealand. Much of our book collection in the early 90s was fictional texts, with a small number of non-fiction books. As more appropriate non-fiction texts became available, our book introductions needed to shift. In the U.S., we were thrilled to add the Ready to Read series and PM Readers to our collections. Unless we increased background knowledge about the book’s content, we were giving surface-level introductions, which limited student access.  We knew little about the animals, settings, activities, vocabulary, and language structures in books that were created for a different population, from another part of the globe. What we failed to realize in our excitement was the need to do some research about the content in the new books we were introducing, if we were to provide students with an entry point into a different type of text.  This is still true today, as we become more skilled at introducing a variety of texts with different demands in a Reading Recovery or classroom setting.

Fictional texts are narratives featuring invented characters, animals, and events.  This type of text tends to have friendly language that flows well and is easy to anticipate, with adequate picture support.

“A typical fiction narrative consists of an opening, the presentation of a problem, a series of events, a climax in which the problem is solved, followed by “falling action” in which loose ends are tied up” (Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S., 2017, p. 282).

Non-fiction texts are based on real people, places, and events.  The format of the text is different than fictional text, and the language structures tend to be more technical.  There is a greater demand for vocabulary knowledge as well.

“Non-narrative text structures include expository, persuasive, and procedural. With expository texts, information is typically organized into categories.  When you read an informational text, you may notice headings and subheadings” (Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S., 2017, p. 282).

Fortunately for beginning readers, fiction and non-fiction are presented in a narrative non-fiction format, which means the story contains facts and is easier for students to read. Crafting a narrative nonfiction or non-fiction book introduction differs from a narrative text.

Marie Clay instructs us to take the time to read the new book and take inventory as to what is accessible to the individual student while examining book format, content, language structures, and visual information. Clay states, “Using the new book, she will introduce something novel to his primed processing system” (Clay, M.M., 2016, p. 113). The new book, by design, is selected to push the boundaries of the student’s learning without unsettling it.

As the teacher, if you select a text for a particular student who is interested in birds, but does not fully understand the content or vocabulary in the new book, then your introduction and support during the first read will be limited and shallow. For example, if a student is interested in birds, but has limited knowledge about birds that live in New Zealand, then the text is likely to be a challenge or too hard. If the subject matter is foreign to us as educators, it will be the same for our students.

The more a student knows about the book, the better he can access the text, which propels readability, improves comprehension, and fosters fluent reading.

“The teaching goal is to settle these new things into the integrated networks of knowledge that this child already controls.  The teacher aims to have the child read the book fluently.  The outcome should be that the reader is keen to move on to the next exciting exposure to new things” (Clay, M.M., 2016, p. 114).

If we neglect to write an introduction that prepares the student for success and improved literacy processing on the first reading of the new book, we have not done our due diligence.

“Reading Recovery students are entitled to inclusive introductions in order to proficiently read nonfiction materials. It is our responsibility to carefully plan book introductions designed to activate prior knowledge and incorporate some of the content and structures that may be difficult for our students to access on their first read. (Anderson, N., & Eure, N., 2007, p. 64).

The more you know about a topic, the more comfortable you feel reading the text, talking about the subject matter, and writing about it.

Reshaping Book Introductions

In this next section, I wrote surface-level book introductions, provided facts about select animals, and then wrote a more comprehensive book introduction to compare the differences. The introductions I crafted are generic examples.  They are not tailored to a particular student.  I caution you not to use these introductions in your lessons without revising them to meet the needs of your individual students.

Think about the two types of book introductions. How can doing a little extra research about a topic make all the difference in supporting a student’s overall understanding of the new book?

Surface Level Introduction

“Lizard Loses His Tail” by Beverley Randell

This is a story about a bird named Kingfisher who wants to have a lizard for lunch. 

Facts about Kingfishers in New Zealand

Kingfishers are particularly active in the early morning. They need to eat regularly and wake up hungry. They are up bright and early in search of food. In open country, insects such as cicadas, beetles, stick insects and weta are caught, along with spiders and small vertebrates, including lizards, mice, and small birds.

Kingfisher

Facts about Lizards in New Zealand

Predators of lizards – rats, mice, moreporks, cats, magpies, mynahs, starlings, and kingfishers.

Many lizards can self-amputate or “drop” their tails, also known as tail autotomy. This is a natural self-defense mechanism that occurs when a lizard is grabbed by a predator or senses a threat. Lizards have a remarkable ability to spontaneously grow new cartilage in response to a skeletal injury.

Lizard

Comprehensive Introduction

In this book, a bird named Kingfisher, who lives in tall trees, looks for lizards to eat.  What the Kingfisher does not know is that lizards can lose their tails when birds swoop down to catch them. Let’s find out what Kingfisher ends up having to eat at the end.

Surface Level Introduction

“Old Tuatara” by Joy Cowley

This is a story about an Old Tuatara that has many animals visit him while he is asleep.

Facts about Tuatara in New Zealand

Tuatara are a rare reptile found only in New Zealand. They are the last survivors of an order of reptiles that thrived in the age of the dinosaurs. Tuataras can live for over 100 years.

While they bask in the sun during the day, adult tuataras are primarily active at night, when their food (insects, lizards, birds, and eggs) is most abundant.

Comprehensive Introduction

In this book, a lizard named Old Tuatara relaxes in the sun to warm his body.  All the animals that come to visit him think he is asleep.   Old Tuatara is not asleep.  He is waiting to catch his favorite insect.  Let’s find out what Old Tuatara had for lunch.

Surface Level Introduction

“The Waving Sheep” by Beverley Randell

Jessica and Daniel went out onto the farm to look for mushrooms.  Instead, they found a sheep on his back.  Let’s see if they can help the sheep.

Facts about Sheep in New Zealand

Sheep farming has played a crucial role in New Zealand’s history and economy, with sheep once outnumbering people significantly.

When sheep fall on their backs in New Zealand, they are considered “cast” and may struggle to get up, potentially leading to distress and death if not assisted. This is often due to a heavy, wet fleece, especially during winter, or being pregnant.

Sheep in NZ

Comprehensive Introduction

Jessica and Daniel live on a farm, with cows and sheep.  While out looking for some mushrooms, Daniel notices a sheep on his back waving his legs back and forth.  The sheep cannot get up on his own since his wool is heavy and wet from the rain.  Let’s see who helps Jessica and Daniel get the sheep back on his feet.

Surface Level Introduction

“Joey” by Beverley Randell

In this book Mother Kangaroo and her baby are in danger of getting eaten by some dogs.

Facts about Kangaroos in Australia

Kangaroos are adapted to a variety of habitats, from open plains to forests and woodlands.

Female kangaroos have a pouch where they carry their young, called joeys.

Kangaroos use their strong tails for balance while jumping.

Comprehensive Introduction

Mother kangaroos carry their babies in their front pouch.  A baby kangaroo is called a Joey and that is what Mother Kangaroo names her baby-Joey.  When danger comes, the baby usually stays inside the pouch.  In this story, when a pack of dogs are near, Mother Kangaroo pushes the baby out of her pouch to hide him in the tall grass from the dogs.  Let’s find out if Mother Kangaroo’s trick works and if Joey is safe.

Closing Thoughts

With technology and search engines at our fingertips, it does not take long to do a little investigation about a new topic.  This wise investment of time enhances your knowledge base, enriches conversation with students, and spills over into engaging writing opportunities. It may even expand the use of different genres with the students you teach.

“Building children’s deep and wide knowledge does not happen by accident.  Teachers must deliberately and intentionally create literacy-learning opportunities focused on expanding children’s content knowledge” (Gibson, S.A., & Moss, B., 2016, p. 65).

I encourage you to work with a colleague or within your professional learning community in crafting book introductions using narrative non-fiction and non-fiction texts based on the profile of a particular student or group.  Examine running records to discover if well-crafted book introductions have a direct correlation to students’ literacy processing, fluency, and comprehension.  Furthermore, survey writing samples to see if there has been a shift in genre or style.

As Dr. Seuss says it best:

“The more that you read, the more things you will know.  The more that you learn, the more places you’ll go.

“You will find magic wherever you look.  Sit back and relax, all you need is a book.”

About the Author

Kathleen A. Brown has worked for 37 years as a classroom teacher, literacy specialist, staff developer, and Reading Recovery teacher.  She has served as the Reading Recovery teacher leader in a large urban district in California for the last 22 years.  Kathleen has provided early literacy training and coaching for the district and has presented at local, state, and national conferences.  Kathleen serves on the Reading Recovery Council of North America board as secretary and is affiliated with St. Mary’s College.

References

Clay, M. M. (2019). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Heinemann.

Clay, M. M. (2016).  Literacy lessons designed for individuals. Heinemann

Eure, N. & Anderson, N. (2007). “Processing Behavior: Early Readers and Nonfiction Text.” Journal of Reading Recovery, Spring 2007

Fountas, I.C. & Pinnell, G.S. (2017) Guided Reading Responsive Teaching Across the Grades. Heinemann

Gibson, S.A. & Moss, B. (2016) Every Young Child a Reader. Teachers College Press

Thank You, Reading Recovery Community!

2023-02-08T18:07:55-05:00November 22nd, 2022|General, Latest News, Reading Recovery Teaching, Reflections and Commentary|

 

Thanksgiving is a time for reflection, togetherness, and gratitude. This year, we’re thankful for every member of the Reading Recovery Community. Thank you for working tirelessly to help children learn to read.

Browse our thank you note gallery below. Add a thank you note you received to the comment section in our community and social media and we’ll add it to this post! Bookmark this post for whenever you need a pick-me-up. Your commitment and passion is appreciated!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intervention Essentials #3: Full Implementation Maximizes Effectiveness

2022-05-25T09:41:55-05:00May 25th, 2022|Latest News, Reading Recovery Teaching|

by Dr. Anne Simpson, Texas Woman’s University

Why does full implementation in Reading Recovery® matter?

The goal of Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura—Reading Recovery in Spanish—is to efficiently and effectively lift the literacy achievement of children who are experiencing difficulties learning to read and write. School systems that choose to implement the interventions do so with the understanding that reducing the number of first graders who have extreme difficulty learning to read and write not only sets students on the path for success in literacy learning but also benefits the total school as well. Full implementation is essential for maximizing the effectiveness.

 

What is Full Implementation?

Full implementation, sometimes referred to as full coverage, means that every child who needs Reading Recovery services has access to the intervention at their school during first grade. Children making low progress in learning to read need to make accelerated growth by increasing their rate of progress relative to the expected growth by the end of first grade in order to close the achievement gap. “A school or district has reached full coverage or full implementation when sufficient time and teacher support is available to serve all identified children (RRCNA, 2021, p. 31).

 

What are the Benefits of Full Implementation?

Students, teachers, and schools benefit from full implementation of the one-to-one intervention that significantly lifts the literacy achievement for each student who receives the intervention. Students develop systems for independent problem solving, often achieving several months of growth in just a few weeks of their daily, individually designed lesson series. Students who make this accelerated progress seldom need referral for long-term interventions, thus reducing costs associated with remedial instruction and referrals to special education. In addition, reducing unnecessary referrals to special education frees time for special education educators to focus their attention on those students who truly need those services. Reading Recovery teachers identify and work with each learner’s strengths and design lessons to support the student making accelerated progress. The focus on a strength-based intervention and teacher expertise lead to a positive and productive learning culture for the whole school. Working from a theory that emphasizes teaching for independence and thoughtful analysis of teaching decisions, schools create a culture of what Fullan & Quinn (2016) refer to as “coherence making.” Schools that operate with coherence build capacity for purposeful action and interaction, building precision in teaching and accountability. The added benefit of full implementation includes the highly trained teachers who share their early literacy expertise to grow collaborative cultures and deepen learning within the total school. While it may take 2–3 years to achieve full implementation, planning for full implementation is an important goal in lifting achievement to within the average band of all readers and writers and reducing the number of referrals to special education or retentions in first grade.

 

How to Plan for Full Implementation

Reading Recovery’s unique system for lifting individual students’ literacy achievement in first grade requires school leaders to think both about student needs on a campus (across a district) and staffing flexibility to achieve full implementation.

 

Student Need

To determine the appropriate level of support, teachers typically begin by identifying 20–25% of their first-graders making the lowest progress on their district early literacy performance indicators (Clay, 2005). Reading Recovery teachers then administer An Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement (Clay, 2019) to determine the children most in need of Reading Recovery instruction. Classroom teachers and the Reading Recovery teacher or a literacy team work together to determine the students most in need and begin by taking the lowest-performing students. By annually being attentive to changes in demographics, changes in performance standards, and changes due to growth, school teams can anticipate the number of teachers who are needed to provide Reading Recovery instruction for all students who need it.

 

Flexible Staffing

Reading Recovery teachers typically serve four students individually in daily lessons for 12–20 weeks (determined by the learner’s progress). The short intensive individual instruction allows teachers to serve between 8–10 students across the school year. Because Reading Recovery instruction is only part of the teacher’s day (typically a .4 FTE), this teacher may use their expertise in a variety of roles within a school during the other part of the day. Flexible staffing models include shared classroom models, English language [EL] services, small-group interventions across other grade levels, literacy coaches, or special education services (RRCNA, 2021).

These flexible staffing models enable schools to achieve full implementation. When a school is fully implemented and all first-grade children who qualify for the intervention have been served by the end of the year, teachers are able to work with kindergarten children or some second-grade students who may have moved in the district or need additional support.

 

An Example

In a school with four first-grade classrooms, each with 22 students, a school team could anticipate that 17–20 students would benefit from Reading Recovery. To achieve full implementation, the school would need two, possibly three, teachers depending on the makeup of the campus. These two teachers would be able to have 8–10 students in their first 12–20 weeks of instruction and potentially 8–10 students in their second 12–20 weeks of instruction. Teaching for acceleration and efficient entry and exit processes will contribute to the efficiency of the implementation. Close collaboration with the classroom teachers maximizes the successful transition into classroom instruction so that the child can learn with independence.

 

Full Implementation Achieved

Full implementation is part of a school and district’s comprehensive literacy plan. Striving to achieve full implementation in schools requires dynamic planning annually to anticipate change in student need and teacher availability. Campus leaders, teacher leaders, site coordinators, and teachers can establish systems for annually reviewing outcomes and anticipating future needs. A commitment to full implementation ensures that children most in need are able to make significant growth in their literacy learning. In addition, the commitment to full implementation reduces the long-term costs of intervening services to educational systems. Full implementation is both a process and a goal in maximizing students’ early literacy success.

 


 

“Intervention Essentials” is a three-part series featured in the Fall 2021 edition of The Journal of Reading Recovery. View and print a copy of Part 3: Full Implementation Maximizes Effectiveness and subscribe to the blog for future releases.

Interested in full access to  The Journal of Reading Recovery? Learn more about becoming a member of RRCNA.

 

 

 


References

Clay, M. M. (2005). Literacy lessons designed for individuals part one: Why? when? and how? Heinemann.

Clay, M. M. (2019). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (4th ed.). Global Education Systems (GES) Ltd.

Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin.

Reading Recovery Council of North America. (n.d.). Effective implementation. https://readingrecovery.org/ reading-recovery/implementation/ effective-implementation/

Reading Recovery Council of North America. (2021). A site coordinator’s guide to the effective implementation of Reading Recovery (2nd ed.)



About the Author

Dr. Anne Simpson is a professor emeritus at Texas Woman’s University, where she was director of Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura. She is a Reading Recovery trainer emeritus with the North American Trainers Group.

Intervention Essentials Part 1: Guaranteed Access to a Full Series of Lessons

2022-04-11T12:33:52-05:00April 11th, 2022|Reading Recovery Teaching, Teaching|

by Connie Briggs

 

Why does the Reading Recovery trademark guarantee participating students a full series of lessons
that may be up to 20 weeks of instruction? 

 

“The quality and integrity of your implementation [Reading Recovery] is protected by a trademark annually granted to sites, pending a review of adherence with the Standards and Guidelines of Reading Recovery in the United States …” (Reading Recovery Council of North America, [RRCNA], 2021, p. 33). With over 35 years of research and excellent national student outcome data, schools and districts that adhere to standards and guidelines—and employ an effective implementation plan—can be assured that investing in Reading Recovery will reduce the number of children with reading difficulties and the long-term cost to their systems for educating these children. Adherence to all aspects of the Reading Recovery standards, guidelines, and procedures is key to establishing and maintaining effective interventions.

 

What is a Full Series of Lessons?
Per Clay’s (2016) design for this intervention, every Reading Recovery student is entitled to a full series of Reading Recovery lessons, and that is individual lessons of 30 minutes daily for a maximum of 20 weeks. Some children will not require the maximum weeks of instruction. They will accelerate their literacy learning and demonstrate the proficiency levels, the literacy processing system, and the learner independence required to ensure their continued literacy learning with less than 20 weeks of instruction. Their series of Reading Recovery lessons then ends as they have achieved intervention goals. They will receive ongoing literacy instruction from their classroom teachers, most often within average groups. Other children will need 20 weeks of instruction to achieve intervention goals, and a small number will not achieve intervention goals even with 20 weeks of individual instruction. Irrespective of their progress, all students are guaranteed access to 20 weeks of lessons. 

 

Why 20 Weeks?  
Adherence to 20 weeks of Reading Recovery instruction for all students in need of this time was suggested by Clay’s early research. Clay (as reported in Clay & Tuck, 1991; reprinted 2009) found that children take different paths to learning and it is not possible to predict at the outset of a learner’s intervention the amount of instructional time needed by the student to reach Reading Recovery goals. In fact, “premature predictions about whether a child would achieve the intervention goals could be wrong for too many children …” (RRCNA, 2021, p. 48). 

Learners enter Reading Recovery with differing prior experiences and varying amounts of literacy awareness, i.e., reading and writing concepts and skills. Consequently, some readers make accelerated progress early in the series of lessons allowing them to exit the intervention with less than 20 weeks of instruction. Other readers need more instructional time to establish a literacy processing system and achieve accelerated progress, and many are successful given the full 20 weeks of instruction. For those children who do not reach the intervention goals after 20 weeks of instruction, Clay (2016) confirmed that access to this full series of lessons, 20 weeks, is paramount to collecting rich, diagnostic information critical for planning the ongoing, literacy support most appropriate for these learners following the Reading Recovery intervention. 

A secondary rationale is based on the number of instructional days in a school year. In the United States, Reading Recovery teachers serve 8–10 students in two rounds of the 20-week intervention. These teachers instruct their intervention students for one-half of their day and fulfill other teaching duties during the rest of their school day. The schedule is not only more cost-effective for the school but also enables the highly skilled teachers to share their expertise with many other students in classrooms or small groups and share their expertise with other teachers in the school. Thus, the 20-week maximum for the intervention, with teachers engaged in Reading Recovery instruction at .5 FTE, provides both economic and academic benefits. 

 

What Happens During the 20-Week Intervention?
Clay’s literacy processing theory focuses on perceptual and cognitive behaviors that change over time as teachers trained in Reading Recovery instruct on the cusp of individual students’ strengths and understandings. Reading Recovery teachers have a deep understanding of emergent literacy development and are able to successfully scaffold a reader’s competencies in literacy across a series of lessons. Reading and writing are viewed as reciprocal processes so during every daily lesson; children read many books, at both their instructional and independent levels, and compose and write many stories. 

One of the hallmarks of instruction is teaching for independence and not doing for the child what he can do for themself. Another hallmark is teaching for problem solving and decision making. Emergent readers must learn to self-monitor when there is dissonance, search for information that will inform a decision, and make a confirmation about the strategic, in-the-head processes that were carried out. Readers entering with limited understandings must learn how to look at print, discriminate among letters, use prior knowledge, link oral language to print, link sounds to letters, develop a repertoire of known words, construct texts, and explore details in print in both reading and writing. The ultimate teaching goal is to support the reader to be constructive and independent as they learn to use phonemic awareness, phonics, oral language, vocabulary, and fluency in the service of reading with meaning (Doyle & Forbes, 2003). The instructional need and the learning path is unique for every student and may require up to 20 weeks of instruction to achieve literacy goals.

 

Positive Outcomes
Every child who receives a full series of Reading Recovery lessons makes progress with two positive outcomes. First, the majority of the lowest-achieving readers and writers make accelerated progress and “have reached grade-level expectations in reading and writing, demonstrating strategic activities that will foster continuing achievement in the classroom with little or no additional support beyond the classroom” (RRCNA, 2021, p. 27). The second positive outcome involves two sets of students: those who, after 20 weeks of instruction, have made impressive gains and have a literacy processing system under construction but need additional support to reach average levels of literacy proficiency. Often, this support comes from the classroom teacher. The second set of students are those few who have made limited progress after a full series of 20 weeks of instruction and are deserving of long-term support. These children are recommended by the school team for further specialist help. “Both [of these outcomes] are positive for the child and for the school” (RRCNA, 2021, p. 27).

 

Conclusion
Each child deserves every opportunity to leave first grade as a confident reader and writer. Becoming literate is crucial to school success; research studies have shown that learners who are poor readers at the end of first grade are likely to be poor readers at the end of fourth grade as well (Juel, 1988). For more than 35 years in the United States, Reading Recovery, a highly successful, research-based, data-driven literacy intervention has helped schools to meet the challenge with a promise of 20 weeks or less.

 


 

“Intervention Essentials” is a three-part series featured in the Fall 2021 edition of The Journal of Reading Recovery. View and print a copy of Part 1: Guaranteed Access to a Full Series of Lessons and subscribe to the blog for future releases.

Interested in full access to  The Journal of Reading Recovery? Learn more about becoming a member of RRCNA.

 

 

 

 


References

Clay, M. M. (2016). Literacy lessons designed for individuals (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

Clay, M. M., & Tuck, B. (1991). A study of Reading Recovery subgroups: Including outcomes for children who did not satisfy discontinuing criteria. Report on research funded by the Ministry of Education, Auckland, New Zealand. Also see Watson, B., & Askew, B. (Eds.). (2009). Boundless horizons: Marie Clay’s search for the possible in children’s literacy (pp. 80–94). Heinemann.

Doyle, M. A., & Forbes, S. (2003). How Reading Recovery teaches the five essential elements of reading instruction and more: National Reading Panel recommendations—and beyond. The Journal of Reading Recovery, 3(1), 1–17.

 Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437

Reading Recovery Council of North America. (2021). A site coordinator’s guide to the effective implementation of Reading Recovery (2nd ed.). 



Connie Briggs is a professor emeritus at Texas Woman’s University and a Reading Recovery Trainer Emeritus with the North American Trainers Group.