Clay's literacy processing theory
In a complex model of interacting competencies in reading and writing the reader can potentially draw from all his or her current understanding, and all his or her language competencies, and visual information, and phonological information, and knowledge of printing conventions, in ways which extend both the searching and linking processes as well as the item knowledge repertoires. Learners pull together necessary information from print in simple ways at first . . . but as opportunities to read and write accumulate over time the learner becomes able to quickly and momentarily construct a somewhat complex operating system which might solve the problem. There is no simplified way to engage in the complex activities . . .
— Clay, 2001, p. 224
While remaining true to the principles of this complex theory of literacy learning, Reading Recovery lessons incorporate the National Reading Panel’s essential components of reading instruction as well as other elements of reading instruction (writing, oral language, motivation, and independence).
Read more about how
Reading Recovery aligns with the National Reading Panel's essential components.
► Phonemic awareness
Marie Clay’s research focused on the formative years of literacy learning. She studied changes in literacy behaviors of young children as they learned to read and write continuous text over a period of time.
Her work led to what she called a literacy processing theory upon which Reading Recovery is based. Principles and assumptions evolving from this theory of literacy processing serve to guide teaching and learning in Reading Recovery.
Reading and writing are complex problem-solving processes.
When children read and write, they pick up and use information from a variety of sources, work on it, make a decision, and evaluate the response in a continuous cycle of learning. Readers and writers take the initiative to solve problems as they acquire and practice in-the-head strategic activities.
Reading and writing are reciprocal and interrelated processes.
A complex theory of literacy learning acknowledges that writers have to know how to do certain things that overlap with things that readers have to know or do. The two processes are concurrent sources of learning and contribute to each other in early literacy learning.
Literacy learning involves reading and writing continuous text.
Readers and writers read continuous text — not just letters, sounds, or words in isolation. Reading and writing continuous text requires the integration of many behaviors essential for meaningful communication.
Literacy learning involves continuous change over time.
As children learn to read and write, their processing systems are changing as they make new links and learn more each time they read or write. Close and careful observations inform teachers about changes in a child’s literacy behaviors over brief periods of time. Daily recording of behaviors enables teachers to make helpful teaching moves.
Children construct their own understandings.
The child must actively work on printed messages using all his current abilities and knowledge, while a teacher supports the child as appropriate.
Children come to literacy learning with varying knowledge.
What children can do when entering school is closely related to their prior opportunities to learn. Therefore, children begin their learning journeys in many different places.
Children take different paths to literacy learning.
Children enter the literacy learning process with differing profiles of competencies and will, therefore, take unique paths to literacy learning. Marie Clay describes this as different paths to common outcomes.
Building on strengths makes it easy for children to learn.
Teachers must know a child’s strengths in order to work with existing competencies and make maximum use of each child’s current literacy repertoire to support accelerated learning.
Learners extend their own learning.
With massive opportunities to read and to compose and write messages pitched at an appropriate difficulty level, children learn more and improve their literacy processing.
Clay, M. M. (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Clay, M. M. (2005). Literacy lessons designed for individuals part one: Why? when? and how? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Jones, N. K., & Smith-Burke, M. T. (1999). Forging and interactive relationship among research, theory, and practice: Clay’s research design and methodology. In J. S. Gaffney & B. J. Askew (Eds.), Stirring the waters: The influence of Marie Clay (pp. 261-285). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Schmitt, M. C., Askew, B. J., Fountas, I. C., Lyons, C. A., & Pinnell, G. S. (2005). Changing futures: The influence of Reading Recovery in the United States. Worthington, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America. (See Chapter 4)
Watson, B., & Askew, B. (Eds.) (2009). Boundless horizons: Marie Clay’s search for the possible in children’s literacy. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann. (See Chapter 3)